Featured Sponsors

Featured Post
Latest Post

Monday, August 13, 2012

pale grass blue butterfly
Japanese scientists say "abnormalities" detected in the country's butterflies may be a result of radioactive fallout from the Fukushima nuclear disaster last year. In a study published in Scientific Reports, an online journal, researchers say "artificial radionuclides" from the Fukushima Daiichi power plant caused "physiological and genetic damage" to pale grass blue butterflies.
Scientists first began tracking common butterflies around the nuclear plant two months after the disaster. They collected 121 insects, and found 12 percent of them had unusually small wings. That number jumped more than 5 percent when butterflies collected from the plant site had offspring of their own.

In another group of butterflies collected six months after the disaster, scientists found 28 percent had "abnormal" traits. That number nearly doubled among the second generation born.

"At the time of the accident, the populations of this species were overwintering as larvae and were externally exposed to artificial radiation," the researchers wrote in their study. "It is possible that they ate contaminated leaves during the spring and were thus also exposed to internal radiation."
It has been 17 months after the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, and its effects on human health have largely been considered minimal, with no radiation-related deaths or illnesses reported so far. But traces of radioactive cesium exceeding government safety levels have been detected in seafood off the Fukushima coast, limiting the catch for fisherman there.
Tiny amounts of cesium of 137 and cesium 134 were detected in more than a dozen bluefin tuna caught near San Diego in August last year. The levels were 10 times higher than tuna found in previous years, but well below those the Japanese and US governments considered harmful to human health.
[Source: yahoo.com ]

Monday, August 13, 2012 No comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, August 10, 2012

Siskiyou National Forest
A Sasquatch Moment In The Siskiyous
An Interview With Kevin Jones
By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher
            There are many bigfoot encounters to tell about. Hundreds of accounts of split seconds in infinity where the storytellers were left wondering if they saw what they thought they saw. But as I listened to Kevin Jones talk about his encounter with a mother and juvenile sasquatch in Oregon back in 1995, it seemed different to me somehow. He had an extra few seconds to watch them and process what he was seeing before they discovered him and slowly and quietly walked into the brush.
Dorraine: When was this encounter?
Kevin: It was on October 3, 1995, around 10 A.M.
Dorraine: And where did this take place?
Kevin: It happened on Siskiyou National Forest land just outside of Grants Pass in southern Oregon.
Dorraine: And what kind of terrain is it in that area?
Kevin: I’m not quite sure how to describe it. Its really rugged forest land in the mountains.
Dorraine: Okay, describe the events leading up to the encounter.
Kevin: I had driven up Mt. Peavine (Merlin/Galice area) to go deer hunting. I reached a locked gate about three miles from the area where I usually hunt. The sun was coming up by the time I started up the road so I was in full hunt mode. I spotted a small group of deer with one buck in the group but was not able to get a shot so I began trying to move closer. I seemed to keep pushing them without being able to ever get clean shot on him. I tracked them around most of the morning. By this time it was late morning just after 10 A.M. The daytime temps were still very warm but I was bundled up for the early morning cold. Thinking the deer would be bedding down, I made my way to a clear cut and found a nice tree stump to sit on. I shed some layers and was enjoying the warm sun. I had been sitting there for about 20 minutes or so when some movement to my right caught my eye.
Dorraine: And what caught your eye?
Kevin:  At a distance of about 60 yards coming out of a draw of trees I saw a large, maybe 7+ foot tall, obviously female Sasquatch walk into the clear cut. A second or two later, just behind her was a very lanky, almost skinny looking juvenile about 3 and a half or 4 feet tall.
Dorraine: Did they see you at that time?
Kevin: For a few seconds they walked in to the clear cut without seeing me.
Dorraine: What were they doing?
Kevin: The little one was really hopping and playing around behind the female, his elbows were raised and he was planting his heels with every deliberate step. The adult saw me, and for a second looked me right in the eyes. I immediately broke eye contact as I was terrified and did not want to provoke her.
Dorraine: What did they do when they saw you?
Kevin:  The female turned her upper body back toward the small one while still walking. The little one immediately went to a hurried walk and was looking around very alertly as if mom had warned him of me. She the turned her focus back to me and put herself between me and the small one. They walked diagonally in front of me crossing the clear cut area.
Dorraine: How far away do you suppose they were?
Kevin: At one point they were no more than 35 yards in front of me.
Dorraine: Can you describe them a little better to me? What color were they?
Kevin: The large one had dark, almost black hair that looked smooth and groomed compared to the little one who had lighter brown hair that was very shaggy looking. The larger one had dark eyes with no whites visible, hair was smooth in appearance and had a shine where the sun hit it. Her nose was fairly flat and her lips seemed thin. She had less hair on her face but looked like she had a three day beard. (Laugh)
Dorraine: Can you describe the juvenile a little better?
Kevin: It was very skinny looking compared to the large one. Also its walk was far less graceful. Almost awkward.  I have to say also he was very cute and endearing. Awkward but cute.
Dorraine: Did you see its face very clearly? Did it look like a chimp’s face?
Kevin: More human looking.  It looked like a dirty or dark skinned kid that never combed his hair or bathed. I couldn't tell if it was male or female but I've always felt it was a boy.
Dorraine: I think it’s interesting when you were talking about their movement and you described the juvenile, it sounded a lot like how a child might goof around. Is that what it looked like?
Kevin: That's exactly what it seemed like to me.
Dorraine: Did you see them do anything else after that?
Kevin:  They walked up to the road.  The little one entered the trees on the other side, the female stopped, turned completely around to face me, stood there for just a second then turned and followed the little one in to the trees and brush. Then within just a second they were out of my sight.
Dorraine: How were you feeling at this point? What were you thinking?
Kevin: I was afraid to even breathe when I saw them. I had my rifle across my lap the whole time but had no thoughts of raising it. After they left my sight I became even more scared. I ducked down behind the stump I was on. I then raised my rifle pointing in the direction I had last seen them. I stayed in that position for about 30 min or so, totally terrified. Every twig snap, squirrel bark, and bird flutter nearly gave me a heart attack.
Dorraine: So how long do you think this whole encounter lasted?
Kevin: Only around 30 seconds or so, but it felt like an eternity. I was frozen in fear! I finally made my way out of the area and back to my vehicle.
Dorraine: Did you ever hear them make any sounds?
Kevin: I didn’t hear any vocalizations.
Dorraine: Did you ever look for or see any tracks?
Kevin: Oh yes. I wish I had known to cast tracks. They were very clear tracks in red clay soil that was fairly soft.
Dorraine: Did you notice anything else?
Kevin:  I noticed from the tracks that the small ones feet were almost as wide as they were long.
Dorraine  What did you do in the days and weeks after the encounter? Did you tell anyone/ alert authorities?
Kevin: I told my wife right afterward, and my neighbor (a friend) the next day, but I never reported it to any officials. I kept it to myself for a few months till I met a couple of researchers who listened to my story. 
Dorraine: As you’re looking back on the whole encounter, how much danger do you believe you were really in, given you were making no move toward the creatures?
Kevin:  I was impressed by her size. She didn't seem aggressive but I sure wasn't going to push my luck. I'm not sure if it was because she was seeing me, but her expression was one of surprise. Hard to describe really. 
Dorraine:  And how do you feel about it all now?  Have you had any additional thoughts, or developed any new philosophies?
Kevin:  Not really, but the whole experience changed me and has shaped who I am today. Just sharing this story from almost 17 years ago puts me right back there as if it just happened. It was, is and without a doubt will always be the most amazing thing I've ever seen!
Summary: After hearing this, it struck me that this was a pretty profound moment. Kevin Jones caught two sasquatches, a mother and juvenile, in the act of being natural. So often, encounters with bigfoot are quick and tense on both sides of the fence. But even though it was only for a very short time, he witnessed them in a family moment doing what they’d do on any regular day as the juvenile, dirty, disheveled, and unaware of potential danger, seemed to do his little “happy dance” behind his mother as Kevin watched from a distance.  It was indeed a once in a lifetime event. *******
DF

©The Crypto Crew 2012




Wednesday, August 8, 2012



TV critics took on Animal Planet’s Finding Bigfoot during a contentious panel at the Television Critics Association’s semi-annual press tour in Beverly Hills on Thursday.
 Reporters have spent nearly two weeks in a hotel interviewing actors and executives promoting TV shows, including the Finding Bigfoot show.
A critic points out: If these guys actually find bigfoot, such huge news is not going to really stay quiet until a regular episode of Finding Bigfoot airs. One asks: Has Animal Planet run out of real animals to do shows about? Yet another wonders: First Animal Planet airs a mermaids special, now this — isn’t Animal Planet damaging its brand with this stuff?

Animal Planet’s president, Marjorie Kaplan, is good humored about the situation. “Animal Planet has many shows about animals that may be more familiar to you,” she says. “Finding Bigfoot is an exploration of the secret corners of the planet … There are places on this planet that we know about and places we don’t … New species are being found all the time.” Kaplan also points out that the Mermaid special had a very high rating.
Kaplan's reply was spot on and a very good way to respond. The same maybe can not be said for Matt Moneymaker and  James “Bobo” Fay.

“I’ve had one 15 feet away growling at me,” declares bigfoot researcher Matt Moneymaker. “So that’s why I think it’s [unfortunate] when people say they’re not real. They exist … I don’t think people realize how many witnesses there are out there … For those who don’t think these things exist, [famed primatologist] Jane Goodall thinks they exist** — and she may know a little more about it than you do.”

“You can’t equate bigfoot with mermaids,” said bigfoot researcher James “Bobo” Fay. “You’re ignorant of the subject matter.”

So it was a fiery exchange between the critics and some of the Finding Bigfoot cast, but chances are the "critics" will be watching and hanging on the edge of their seats for each episode.

Thanks
Tom

[source: Insidetv ]

Monday, August 6, 2012

Why We’re Naked and Why Mermaids Could Possibly Exist

Exploring The Rejected “Aquatic Ape Theory”

By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher

     Even though the Discovery Channel’s recent special about mermaids was a dramatization, the theory behind it, the aquatic ape hypothesis (AAH),  is sound and credible whether science wants to believe it or not. It presents a pretty sensible solution to the question of why humans are the only naked ape. But to this day, it’s still rejected by scientists in the mainstream.

     First introduced by marine biologist Alister Hardy in 1960, the aquatic ape hypothesis was brought to the attention of the public by a probing press, but it was first explained in better detail  by Welsh writer Elaine Morgan. I first became familiar with her work years ago when I read her best-selling book, The Descent Of Woman that had first been published back in 1970.
     Aquatic theory, in a nutshell, attempts to explain why we humans evolved differently in many key ways from other apes. Why are we the only naked ape? Why are we the only apes that cry? Why do we have webbed fingers? Why do we take to the water so well unlike other apes, and why are our offspring born knowing how to swim? Why does our heart rate slow when we dive into the water unlike other apes? Why are we more streamlined than other apes? And why do we retain more body fat than they do?
   Morgan, who wasn’t a paleontologist or anthropologist, but an articulate writer who had written for many scientific journals and knew her subject well, explained it all to the public in layman’s terms, causing many people to embrace the hypothesis. Many except the scientific community that has, over 40 years later, not given a satisfactory explanation of why they reject it so strongly.

AAH gives a more pertinent viewpoint about everything that’s different about humans.
            Morgan explained that in some very early history of the evolutionary story, humans entered the water at some point for the purpose of survival. There are many reasons this could have happened. Food sources there would have been easy to acquire and plentiful. Many of the most dangerous predators in Africa didn’t necessarily like the water, so it would have been a safe haven for our ancestors at that time who were much smaller, easier targets. Especially the females who may have been on their own part of the time, often carrying an infant, making them twice as vulnerable to danger. Interestingly, human babies are born knowing how to “swim” in a way. And they automatically hold their breath in the water. Why is this? No other primate babies have that skill.

     Why are we the only naked ape? AAH says that most animals that have become aquatic at some point have lost most of their hair. Whales, manatees, and hippos to name a few. Scientists recently discovered an ancestor of the rhinoceros that was believed to have spent most of its time in the water, explaining its hair loss. And many believe the same thing happened to elephants, who are to this day, excellent swimmers and love the water.
     Why do we have webbed toes and fingers? If you look at a chimps hands, you’ll find no trace of any such webbing. And the interesting thing about this phenomena is that in looking at modern water retrievers, you’ll notice they have webbed toes. And this is something that has developed within a very short time in history; perhaps a couple hundred years. So our human ancestors wouldn’t necessarily have had to remain aquatic for very long in order for these kinds of changes to take place.
     Why do we retain body fat in a way no other apes on earth do? Maybe it’s because other animals that have become aquatic and lost their hair, have at the same time, developed a layer of subcutaneous fat for warmth and the protection of vital organs and tissue. Manatees, whales, hippos and others all evolved more body fat to adapt to life in the water.
    And why do we seem to be so streamlined and designed for the water. We need only to watch Olympic divers to see how well humans have adapted to life in the water. No other ape has that streamlined, almost fish-shaped body so well suited to moving through the water with ease. And our heart rate actually slows when we dive into the water? Why is that? Perhaps to conserve the much needed oxygen while we’re holding our breath underwater. This wouldn’t be necessary had we not been spending a lot of time in the water at some time in history.

And the list goes on. All our quirkiest traits can be explained by this hypothesis.
So if we choose to aspire to the theory, is it much of a stretch to think that mermaids of a sort could exist? Perhaps not the type we recognize from familiar folklore, but something different than we may imagine. Maybe small groups of these aquatic apes returned to land after a time, and maybe other groups simply stayed in the water and developed more fine-tuned adaptations in order to remain there. Like hands with better webbing, stronger lungs, transformation of legs to a tail fin, etc. If we think of it this way, it’s not completely beyond the realm of possibility.
  We know from chasing Bigfoot around the forests, that just because we’ve never actually seen a creature, doesn’t necessarily mean it doesn’t exist. And this idea is no different. *********
DF

Related Video



Sunday, August 5, 2012

 
NASA's Mars Rover Curiosity is Just Hours from it's Mars Landing - The landing will mark the beginning of a two-year prime mission to investigate one of the most intriguing places on Mars. This landing appears to be in a better place in my opinion than the previous missions. This could be a monumental mission on Mars. The landing will take place at around 1:30 am eastern time tonight. 
 
Here is some important for those who want to keep up with the landing and mission.  
 
 
http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl - Official Ustream
 
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html - NASA TV (Normally a live stream)
 
 https://www.facebook.com/#!/MarsCuriosity - Official Facebook Channel
 
Hope everyone enjoys this and good luck to Curiosity!
 
Thanks
Tom
Sunday, August 05, 2012 No comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , ,
I have tried to do some enhancements of the photos.
Original photo by Albert Fuhs
Several ask where to look in the photo and Albert said: "..this guy in the low center was the first to show him self to me 5years ago....a baby in the tree on the far right tree"
So I did some enhancements of the photo
This is the one in the center of the picture
Here is the one of the reported baby:
baby bigfoot in a tree
Here is a possible 3rd bigfoot according to some views of this photo. Is this the one that is 8 foot tall?

Is this an 8ft tall bigfoot?


Here is the second photo
Second photo that was posted
Here is a zoom on the photo
is this bigfoot?maybe 2?
Here is the 3rd and possibly the best of the 3
Bigfoot and a deer
Here is what Albert said about this photo "..100% bigfoot with a rock in hand. i will call him rusty.."
Here is a zoomed and enhanced version of the photo
is this a bigfoot getting ready to throw a rock?
Thanks goes to Jimmy Craze and Albert Fuhs.
We are glad Albert decided to come out and let us know these are his photos.I should also make it clear that I "think" these are still frames from a video and not taken with a camera.
We would like to know what the readers think about these photos...TCC is still trying to find out more about the photos and the film.
*Please do not use our enhanced photos unless you give us credit and a link to our website.
Thanks
Tom
Sunday, August 05, 2012 6 comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Thursday, August 02, 2012 2 comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Wednesday, August 01, 2012 3 comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, July 30, 2012

I of course will change his name in a effort to protect his identity.This story was told to me about 15 years ago and the event happened,I guess, about 20-25 years ago. I will tell it the best I can remember,I'm sure I've forgoten some of the details but the core of the story has stayed with me for all these years. This was a person who I had always found to be very truthful, so I do believe what he told me. 
Artist rendering of what the base may have looked like. Artwork by GuidedbyPandas
So one day I was talking to Mike Harris and we got off on the subject of UFOs for some reason.
He said "well,I had something happen while I was in the military".
Of course I was wanting to know what happened so I said "you did, What was it?"
He said  "well I was instructed not to say anything about it, but it's been a while now." He kind of paused and said "I was a medic in the army and it had come time that almost everyone was on leave for a few days, but me being a medic I stayed at the base. Well late one evening a call came in that there was need for a medic and me being the only medic at the base at that time I had to go give assistants. 
Not long after the call 2 MPs showed up to take me on site. The MPs instructed me to keep silent and not talk about where they where taking me and that I could not tell anything about what I saw.
After a short ride we arrived at a base,I had never been there before, we go into the base, the 2 MPs on each side of me and we get ready to go into where they need the medic. 
The 2 MPs get these 2 large black blocker shields. One MP on each side of me with the shields, this was an attempt to block me from seeing and it worked to some degree.
As we start walking in the underground part of this base,heading back to where someone was in need of medical attention, the 2 MPS were on each side of me, I could see these rolls of tubes on each side of the hallway, the tubes were kind of leaned back at a slight angle. I could see by looking more out in front of me, because to each side of me was totally blocked by the MPs, but there was a little gap in the forward direction for me to see where to walk."
He continued the story:
"The lighting was not that great, but I could see these tubes and there were creature type things in them."  At this point I ask him if the creatures looked human. He said "oh no these were ....well looked like a typical alien.... but there were different ones, they all didn't look alike. I have never seen anything like that, it was kind of scary. The tubes were full of liquid." 
I said what happened next? He replied " I got back to where the guy was hurt and treated him, it wasn't nothing too bad, he had some burns. After that the MPs led me back out of the base and returned me to my base."
At this point,best I can remember, he need to go because he was either on his way to work or going to pick up his kids from school. I can't remember for sure. We never talked about this again and it was not long after this that he moved and so did I. 
Thanks
Tom
©The Crypto Crew
[Image art by GuidedByPandas]
Monday, July 30, 2012 No comments » by Thomas Marcum
Posted in , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, July 27, 2012



“Sister Species” Of Neanderthals Found
Suggesting Parallels To Dr. Ketchum’s DNA Study?
By Dorraine Fisher - TCC Team Member
            Shards of “foreign DNA” have recently been discovered in three different groups of modern Africans offering clues that a strange “sister species” of neanderthals walked the earth alongside modern humans and neanderthals 20,000 to 50,000 years ago.
            According to Newser.com and The Washington Post, this new strain of DNA discovered at the University of Washington in Seattle bears no resemblance to either human or neanderthal DNA but has somehow found its way into the modern human family tree. And there’s only one way it could’ve done that: interbreeding.
            Neanderthal DNA has been found in modern day Europeans, suggesting interbreeding between the two species. But this new DNA is completely different and suggests a third determining factor in the evolutionary puzzle of modern humans. It points to a new idea that three different hominid species walked the earth at that time and they all interbred periodically,  creating the humans we are today.
            But this poses another question in the Bigfoot world.
            When news of Dr. Ketchum’s DNA study became the big topic of discussion earlier this year, rumors swirled around the community that the findings of the study might resemble humans more than other apes, suggesting that Bigfoot might be another strain of human. And it was also suggested that Bigfoot might be another hominid related more closely to Neanderthals, which had been believed to have interbred with homo sapiens.   This would obviously place modern human DNA into results of the Bigfoot DNA examination. But without fossil records, it’s impossible to know what these newly discovered hominids looked like.
            And of course, no DNA results are in yet. We’re all still waiting for Dr. Ketchum to make the announcement. 
            But we have to ask the question:
            If Bigfoot is indeed more human than ape as is rumored, and since different types of human like hominids were known to have interbred with each other successfully thousands of years ago, would this new strain of DNA point to an ancestor of Bigfoot?  And since there are no fossils records to determine the appearance of this hominid, could it actually BE Bigfoot?
            The Washington Post suggested in amazement that we, the modern humans, were the only strain to survive this great evolution. But, given what we all know, are we so sure of that? *********
DF
©The Crypto Crew
[ Source -Washington post ]




Thursday, July 26, 2012

The Crypto Crew - Submit Sighting - TCC Team
Interactive Sightings Map

SPONSOR LINKS: Available Contact us

Help Us!

Help Support
The Cyrpto Crew

[If interested in licensing any of our content,Articles or pictures contact us by Clicking Here]

.
"..you’ll be amazed when I tell you that I’m sure that they exist." - Dr. Jane Goodall during interview with NPR and asked about Bigfoot.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material and is presented in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, of US copyright laws.


Contact Form

The Crypto Crews blog is protected under the Lanham (Trademark) Act (Title 15, Chapter 22 of the United States Code)

Site Stats

Total Pageviews