“Sister
Species” Of Neanderthals Found
Suggesting
Parallels To Dr. Ketchum’s DNA Study?
By
Dorraine Fisher - TCC Team Member
Shards
of “foreign DNA” have recently been discovered in three different groups of
modern Africans offering clues that a strange “sister species” of neanderthals
walked the earth alongside modern humans and neanderthals 20,000 to 50,000
years ago.
According
to Newser.com and The Washington Post, this new strain of DNA discovered at the
University of Washington in Seattle bears no resemblance to either human or
neanderthal DNA but has somehow found its way into the modern human family
tree. And there’s only one way it could’ve done that: interbreeding.
Neanderthal
DNA has been found in modern day Europeans, suggesting interbreeding between
the two species. But this new DNA is completely different and suggests a third
determining factor in the evolutionary puzzle of modern humans. It points to a
new idea that three different hominid species walked the earth at that time and
they all interbred periodically,
creating the humans we are today.
But
this poses another question in the Bigfoot world.
When
news of Dr. Ketchum’s DNA study became the big topic of discussion earlier this
year, rumors swirled around the community that the findings of the study might
resemble humans more than other apes, suggesting that Bigfoot might be another
strain of human. And it was also suggested that Bigfoot might be another
hominid related more closely to Neanderthals, which had been believed to have
interbred with homo sapiens. This would
obviously place modern human DNA into results of the Bigfoot DNA examination.
But without fossil records, it’s impossible to know what these newly discovered
hominids looked like.
And
of course, no DNA results are in yet. We’re all still waiting for Dr. Ketchum
to make the announcement.
But
we have to ask the question:
If
Bigfoot is indeed more human than ape as is rumored, and since different types
of human like hominids were known to have interbred with each other successfully
thousands of years ago, would this new strain of DNA point to an ancestor of
Bigfoot? And since there are no fossils
records to determine the appearance of this hominid, could it actually BE
Bigfoot?
The
Washington Post suggested in amazement that we, the modern humans, were the
only strain to survive this great evolution. But, given what we all know, are
we so sure of that? *********
DF©The Crypto Crew
[ Source -Washington post ]
facebook.com/TheCryptoCrew
Send us an Email
Now you can get our blog on your Kindle!
This is awesome. I remember laying in bed as a kid, thinking about us humans and wondering how many different kinds there have been over the history of our planet. I pondered where Bigfoot fit into all this. I'm excited to see all this evidence building up about our origins and our relatives. Will check out the original article. I'm so psyched!!
ReplyDeleteyeah to me this was exciting and welcomed news. Seems everyone in the Ketchum camp is being pretty tight lipped at the moment.
DeleteSomeone actually reacted (above) "Fake" to this aticle. LOL. Sources are The Washington Post (actually originally posted to New York Times), the University of Washington, The University of Pennsylvania (the Ivy league school initiated the study), leading geneticists, and anthropologists - well with these source it must be Fake!!! :P
ReplyDeleteI guarantee - you could parade a living Bigfoot into the living room of some people and they will STILL deny it exists! Watch that edge when you get to Hawaii, that's a big fall off the planet. lol
David, some guy affiliated with Pandas
Correct - some people will never believe in bigfoot. Even when the scientific community confirms it, some will still be non believers.
DeleteThats why you need a body. If smeja is telling the truth then break out the bodies. I know damn well he didnt leave the biggest discovery of our lives there to rot...think about it. I have seen one and know they are real however dr.ketchum is in this for money and couldn't give a shit less if bigfoot exist or not. she has been payed and still no results.Sykes will have his published in december. How can he be so sure you ask? because he knows what he is doing. There is a reason her company has a grade f at the bbb.
ReplyDelete