Angels, Aliens, And
Bigfoot
What
Is The “Unknown Primate” In The DNA Study?
By TCC Member
Dorraine Fisher
 |
| DNA Questions |
It
now seems pretty clear there are some major discrepancies in Dr. Ketchums DNA
information. It suggests that some union
took place no more than 15,000 years ago between humans and some “unknown
primate” to produce the creature we know as sasquatch or bigfoot. But we’ve clarified that production of
fertile offspring between two different species isn’t possible. So what is this
“unknown primate.” Given the information we have, the unknown primate would
have had to have been some type of human.
Some argue that this can’t be true because we
humans have Neanderthal in our DNA makeup. And if that’s the case, then, at
some point, interbreeding must have taken place between humans and neanderthals
(supposed non-human). But due to similarities in DNA structure, the debate
rages on with paleoanthropologists about whether Neanderthals should be
reclassified as a type of homo sapiens (humans). The belief among many is that
Neanderthals ARE human. Perhaps even enough to have interbred with our
ancestors and produced successful, fertile offspring.
Dr.
Ketchum claimed to have compared the DNA of her unknown hominid to the DNA of
both Neanderthals and Denisovans and that the DNA of her hominid is different.
But such a comparison would require nuclear DNA from both of them, which is,
from what I’m being told, unavailable. Nuclear DNA is much harder to preserve.
Extracting it from a fossil is not likely. And extracting enough of it for
replication such as this would be nearly impossible.
So
can we be absolutely sure of what this “unknown primate” is not? Can the “unknown primate” be determined at
all?
Earlier
this year, a skull that had been found in northwest Mexico in Copper Canyon was
determined to have a DNA structure that matched no other on earth. It was
called the
Star Child.
Humans share at
least a small percentage of their DNA structure with every creature on earth,
but the Star Child shares none. The Star Child’s DNA was determined to be “not
of this world.”
But
how does this weigh in to the debate? There’s a possibility it has nothing to
do with anything. But Dr. Ketchum leaving this gigantic hole in the story
leaves us all to speculate. With all this talk about aliens, and angels
swirling around this subject, and no real confirmation of what the DNA does or
doesn’t reveal outside of the human factor, what could be going on here?
If
you’re one of those people, like me, that might allow your imagination to wander
a bit, and if you believe there are great mysteries out there that may never be
proven or disproven by science, there could be many possibilities.
Angel
or alien “DNA,” as has been suggested, could be something like a DNA extracted
from a creature like the Star Child, not of this world, or not entirely of this
world. In order for this supposed hybridization to take place to create a
sasquatch, all that has to have happened was a human interbreeding with another
being that was close enough to human to get the job done and produce fertile
offspring to carry on the line.
It
could have been a Neanderthal, or Denisovan, since they are considered human
enough to interbreed and since that can’t be disproven as far as we know. Or it could be some other unknown primate,
possibly extinct now, or some lost tribe of humans. OR it could be a being
completely unknown to us, or “not of this world” much like the Star Child. Some
other forces could have come into play here that can’t be readily understood
without more study; things that are not yet known by science. In that context,
the whole alien and angel possibility starts to become more viable. And until
we have concrete facts on the table to explain exactly what a sasquatch is,
nothing can really be discounted.
Dr.
Jeffrey Meldrum released a statement saying the release of this information was
premature but precipitated by other leaked information. And he appealed to all
of us to wait and see what the final results will reveal. So maybe Dr. Ketchum felt she had no choice
in the matter, and maybe this will be cleared up in due time. We can only hope.
We’re
also hoping the upcoming results from the
Sykes DNA Project will be revealed
soon and will clarify this and close the debate once and for all.
But, given what we’ve all been through in
waiting for this study to come to fruition, we’re only cautiously optimistic.
*******DF
[Special Thanks to Dale Drinnon]
This post sponsored in part by
(Interested in sponsoring a story? then send us an Email!)
Posts
