Maybe
you remember this video? It was featured on Finding Bigfoot season one and touted as a real white bigfoot by members
of the show’s crew.So, of course, the
team at The Crypto Crew had to take a look.
But
to us, it became clear that this so-called “white bigfoot” looked very strange.
For one thing, it’s white coat turned tan at the elbows down to the hands. And
he also looked dark-colored from the waist down.And this supposed “white bigfoot” looked very
small and lanky...and highly suspicious.
So
our very own video expert, Tom Marcum, did an analysis. And here’s what he
found.
In July 2 young girls,age 8 and 11, were attacked by a beaver and suffered serious injuries. In August a beaver attacked a boy scout leader in Pines Plains, N.Y. biting him in the leg, buttocks, arm, hand and torso before he managed to grab it and hold its jaw closed.
Now Lillian Peterson, 83 years old, was attacked by a rabid beaver while out for her half mile swim.
The attacked took place at Barcroft Lake near her home in Falls Church, Va.
"The animal jumped on me," she told WUSA-TV. "He hit me so hard it knocked me over and started chewing on my leg."
The beaver weighed 35 pounds and was nearly two feet long!
Peterson's friend, Mike Korin, managed to pound the beaver with his paddle until it appeared dead. Emergency medical crew arrived on the scene and began treating Peterson.
Then, all of a sudden, the beaver flipped over and came back to life! A paramedic grabbed a canoe paddle to beat the beaver yet again while
Korin tossed a fishing net over the creature and tethered it to a light
pole on the lake shore. Animal control officers arrived on the scene and euthanized the beaver. The beaver was later confirmed to have been rabid.
Peterson will undergo a few rounds of rabies shots. Peterson said “There is no way I will swim in that place again,”
TCC - This story makes be wonder if it is possible for sasquatch to become rabid?
This was recorded in Upstate New York. The Researcher is Billy Mills. This video is brought to you by Renegade Bigfoot Society, N.E.B.O & The Crypto Crew. Turn up your speakers a little.
Amazing reply knocks and not just a couple but many.
As
we’re still waiting for Dr. Ketchum’s DNA results, some other DNA results are
making headlines these days that could pose some new questions about DNA results
we explore for unknown species’ in the future.
The
Star Child skull has been found to share no DNA structure with any other
species on earth. But does this mean it’s alien, or simply that it has no
relation to normal human genetics? Humans share at least a percentage of their
DNA structure with every animal on earth. But the Star Child shares none. So
what gives?
The
Star Child Project has been in place since February of 1999 with the objective
of discovering the origin of a human-like skull found in a mine tunnel in
Copper Canyon in northwest Mexico.It
was found alongside a normal human female skull but, upon examination, bears
only a slight resemblance to a human, which has led many to speculate about what
it is.
At
first glance it appears to be the skull of a deformed human child. But
deformity has been ruled out with careful analysis. And, in spite of its
child-size, it is no longer believed to be a child at all. Examination of the
tooth wear of the skull indicates this being was at least the age of a young
adult.
Human
eye sockets are generally about two inches deep, while the eye sockets on the
Star Child skull are only one half inch deep. This means its eyes would have
not have functioned anything like human eyes and probably looked very different
from human eyes.
The
cranial/brain volume of the Star Child was much larger suggesting a much larger
brain than humans. And the hole where the brain enters the skull is oval shaped
rather than round like a human neck. This suggests that it had no voice
mechanism and would not have been able to speak like a normal human. Does this
mean it communicated via telepathy?
Possibly
these results raise more questions than they answer, but it leaves us to wonder
about other DNA results we’re waiting for. There’s been so much speculation
about what the bigfoot DNA results will reveal. Will we find that bigfoot is
related more to humans, is it possibly alien, (which would have seemed a crazy
question to ask just a year ago) or are they something else entirely?
Knowing
the unprecedented results of the Star Child DNA study, the possibilities for
bigfoot are now endless. *******
This
picture was taken by a subject known only as Zartha. This person was strolling
in a local park (location unknown) when he/she saw this at the end of the long,
dark sidewalk. Could it be a real werewolf captured on film? Bigfoot?
Mothman?Or something else? The person
reported there were no lights and the end of this walkway. So what is this? I
don’t know, but it’s fun to think about. You make the call.
* My apologizes to MK Davis, I did not know it was him who did work on this,Part of the video we used was some of his work,I spent hours looking at many videos from various youtube accounts, Never seen MK Davis on the account or Credit would have been given at the first. I did spend countless hours going frame by frame,zooming and trying to pull out details. I compared it to many different youtube Patterson videos. I did advance it by adding in the head turn and more. Once again my apologies to MK Davis.
Patty squatted down
So
You Still Don’t Think The Patterson-Gimlin Film Is A Real Sasquatch?
The
Crypto Crew Offers Some Reasons To Reconsider
By TCC Team Member
Dorraine Fisher
It’s
a neverending debate. Is it fact or faked?
But
after the countless scientific studies that have been conducted on the famous
Patterson-Gimlin bigfoot film shot in Bluff Creek, California back in 1967, it
still hasn’t been disproven. But I’m always surprised to find how many people
still believe it’s a hoax. Didn’t several people confess to wearing the suit that
day? Yes, and that makes it easy for some to settle for the idea of it being a
hoax when they don’t know all the facts about the film. The story runs quite a
bit deeper than many imagine.
There
are numerous discrepancies. As the film has been studied over and over again,
many details can be found that point to it being the real deal...if one bothers
to look.
Patty's Toes are seen moving,original frames - photo from Themunnsreport.com
Up
and down movement of the creature’s toes is one. This kind of movement in a
costume isn’t possible. The creature’s calf muscles flex as she walks; also not
possible in a suit. Many have tried to duplicate this muscle movement in a suit
and not accomplished it as yet. And the open and closing motion of the mouth is
not possible if it’s someone wearing a mask. But the biggest problem with the
idea of it being a suit is that human proportions and ape proportions are not
the same. Apes have must longer arms and a much longer upper lip making it
impossible for a human to fit properly into a suit such as the one in the film.
Human arms would be too short and not able to function like a creature, and the
mask would not fit a human properly...and a hoaxer certainly would not be able
to move its mouth in a mask as it struggled with this inconvenience.
Bob
Hieronimous was one of the guys who confessed to wearing the suit that day. But the
subject in the film was found to be at least 6.5 feet tall. Other studies have
showcased the possibility she was closer to 7.5 feet tall. But either way, Bob
H. wasn’t tall enough to wear a suit that big.
Patty's Butt Crack
Another
thing that’s rarely discussed is a portion of the film at the very beginning
when the camera was shaking. Patty was squatted down on the ground, looking for
food, defecating, or drinking or eating. But with a little enhancement to the
film, her butt crack can be seen pretty clearly. This is a strong detail that
wasn’t being created in costumes back in the 1960s. It would have taken a lot
of time and meticulous work to create such a compelling detail.
And
lastly but certainly not least, on examining the ending of the film closer, a
second creature, possibly a male, can be seen moving near the creek bed. It
appears to be moving its arms and then moving its head to look back at Patty.
Is this another guy in a suit?Probably
not. It would be hard enough to create one suit, let alone two. The main focus
has always been on the subject, Patty, so there are many other details of the
film that have been overlooked. *******
Most
primates live in small groups. Should sasquatches be any different?
The famous Patterson-Gimlin film
taken at Bluff Creek, California way back in 1967 was always said to be a film
of a single sasquatch female walking across a dry creek bed and into the cover
of the woods only to disappear. But if primates live in groups, especially
females, was she really alone that day?
The
film has been subject to scrutiny for years, but no one has ever been able to
completely debunk it. And no one has ever been able to create a costume that
compares with the creature in the film. And since often only one of the
creatures is spotted at a time, we’re conditioned to believe they are solitary
creatures that travel and hunt alone.But interestingly enough, no one has ever looked at anything else in the
film except the main subject affectionately known by bigfoot enthusiasts as
“Patty.”
But
if you watch the film more closely and look behind her on the hill, there seems
to be other things going on. There are some very dark figures moving ever so
slightly in the woods in the background. Could there be more of the creatures
hiding in the brush? Could there be a whole group of them there?
Random youtube video of the Patterson film, 2nd figure is seen standing
The
Crypto Crew’s very own team leader Tom Marcum, a video and photo expert,
decided to take a closer look at the background in the film. And one day he
spent hours going frame by frame and working with still shots until he reached
an astonishing conclusion.
When
he came across a frame that looked curious, he highlighted it to the maximum,
only to discover at least three other figures that can be identified as possible
primates in the dark woods.And then
there are many other dark figures that are not so recognizable that could
possibly be others.
Zoom from the above random youtube video of the Patterson film
But it became clear that Patty wasn’t alone at Bluff
Creek that day. She had her whole family
with her nearby.Roger Patterson swore to the film’s
authenticity till his dying day.
And Tom’s hard work gives it even more
credibility.******** DF
[This report was submitted to TCC Team Member Jason Morse]
Cody Archambeault recounts what he saw that day.
"I was hunting with my dad about 5 years ago (when i was 14). It was around the end of October when it starting to get fairly cold at night. We were on Lee Hook Road in Lee, N.H.. By the University of New Hampshire dairy farm.
I was sitting against a stone wall when I heard something moving in the woods behind me. It was probably about 4:45 in the afternoon and the sun was starting to set. And I had turned around to look to see if it was a deer. And there it stood.
It was approx. 6'6 to 7 feet in height. Probably weighed around 300 pounds. And it was more of a darker brown color. I'm pretty sure it never saw me because I couldn't believe what I was seeing and I was frozen solid. It had a really bad musty kind of smell when it walked by me.
It was also only about 50 to 75 yards in front of me. It was making these kind of low toned grunts as it walked. And was looking around as if it knew (that I or something was there, or different than what it was used to). I watched it for probably about 10 to 20 minutes. It had walked from in the woods, to out and across the field i was sitting on the edge of. And I had told my dad what I had saw. And he told me I must have been just imagining things cause there aren't any of those around here.
But then I had showed him where it had walked and there were footprints for probably about a half of a mile that we followed. But then it got dark and he didn't want to find out what I really did see that day.
TCC - Great sighting. Also I think in the picture above is the exact location, I think the dairy farm is the set of building just off center to the left towards the top of the picture. Thanks to Cody for sharing his encounter.
Robin
Lynne Forestpeople knows what it means to be called crazy. She claims to have
seen, photographed, and interacted with a group of Sasquatches that she has known
to have lived in the forest around her backyard for several years now. And the
experiences she describes are extraordinary.And many might call her character into question, so I knew I had to talk
to her. And when I spoke to her frankly about her “friends” in her back yard
that she calls “forest people,” I found her to be very genuine, credible and
down-to-earth. Not to mention one of the nicest ladies I’ve ever met. She’s a
pretty normal mother of three who just happens to have some very strange activity
around her house every day.
[ This story comes from a friend of TCC Team Member Dax Rushlow.Last name with held at witness request. Enjoy] [Dax - She lives 15 miles from where I had my Face to face encounter.]
Dawn's Story
I remember Dax telling me about his bigfoot encounter not long after it
happened. Yes I believe he saw one. My Bigfoot scare was early spring
of this year. (Dax- She said this happened in April)
My dog woke me up at around 3:00am, he was agitated and
growling. I got up and put his leash on so he could go outside.
As soon
as I opened the door he flipped out as did I. I heard the scariest
scream/yell I have ever heard in my life. It was loud and seemed to echo
through all the mountains. I could hear all my neighbors dogs going
crazy. My dog was growling and he just doesn't do that.
Then the scream came again. I was so freaked out I ran back in the
house.
I waited a few minutes and ventured out again. The scream came 3
more times. At that point I locked my door and made sure my gun was
loaded.
I didn't sleep well the rest of the night. The next day I got in
YouTube and listened to recorded bear calls. Nothing came even close to
what I heard.
Then I typed in bigfoot screams and there it was. I got
chills listening to it. Yea Bigfoot is real in my book. Thought you
would enjoy my story. Lots of love, Dawn
TCC - Thanks for allowing us to run your story Dawn! If anything else happens make sure to contact us.
Chimpanzees pass down a ‘secret handshake’ through the generations, according to a new study.
Researchers found that troops of chimps pass on traditions, including the handshake, from one generation to the next - and they differ from group to group.
When chimps are cleaning, they adopt a ‘grooming handclasp’ - two chimps clasp onto each other’s arms, raise them in the air and groom each other with their free hand.
Previous research suggest this handclasp may be a cultural phenomenon - like how people greet each other - but only some chimpanzee colonies practice this grooming behavior.
Researchers looked at chimps on the Chimfunshi Wildlife Orphanage Trust in Zambia - finding some prefer to clasp hands, while others clutch onto another chimp’s wrist.
Edwin van Leeuwen, of the Max Planck Institute, said: 'We don’t know what mechanisms account for these differences.
'But our study at least reveals that these chimpanzee communities formed and maintained their own local grooming traditions over the last five years.
'Our observations may also indicate that chimpanzees can overcome their innate predispositions, potentially allowing them to manipulate their environment based on social constructs rather than on mere instincts.'
Observations also revealed grooming behaviors are transmitted to the next generation of potential handclaspers - showing the chimps learn from one another.Mark Bodamer, of Gonzaga University, said: 'By following the chimpanzees over time, we were able to show that 20 young chimpanzees gradually developed the handclasp behavior over the course of the five-year study.
'The first handclasps by young individuals were mostly in partnership with their mothers.
'These observations support the conclusion that these chimpanzees socially learn their local tradition, and that this might be evidence of social culture.
'Continued monitoring of these groups of chimpanzees will shed light on the question of how these group-traditions are maintained over time and potentially even why the chimpanzees like to raise their arms up in the air during social grooming in the first place.' [Source: dailymail ]
TCC - Hmmm "Secret Handshake" ..does this mean their hiding something? I have heard rumors for years that Chimps could speak but choose not to around human....if so Smart move on the chimps part. Wonder what else they are hiding.
Thanks
Tom
Image above shows the craggy mountainside where Curiosity, Nasa’s planetary explorer, hopes to discover signs that life once existed on Mars. The six-wheeled rover, which landed earlier this month, will edge its way to the foot of the mountain, 6.2 miles away, to scratch around in the dirt, dust and soil. Chemical analysis of those samples should reveal whether Mars ever had the organic materials that could support life and may help answer one of the greatest questions of science: is life unique to Earth or did it once exist elsewhere in the Solar System?
I mostly posted this because I like the photo and how it really don't look much different than some places here n Earth.
Go Mars!
70+ videos & 650+ pictures on our facebook site check it out by clicking the link below. facebook.com/TheCryptoCrew
Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Posts
