Taking A Closer Look At How We Perceive The “Truth”
By Dorraine Fisher
Did we as a society create the flat-earth theory? Maybe.
I can see it now. People reading this headline and instantly thinking that Dorraine Fisher and The Crypto Crew advocate for the Flat Earth Theory. But although we believe in the possibilities of many things as purveyors of cryptozoology and the paranormal, we are not purveyors of Flat-Earth Theory. But it’s a topic worth exploring, and I’ll tell you why. Flat Earth Theory is a catalyst for a conversation that needs to take place that really has nothing to do with the earth being flat. Or maybe it does. I guess you can decide. But this is just a world of ideas and we’re all caught up in the storm of them all.
Full Moon Energy Report May 2018 Full Flower Moon In Bloom
By Dorraine Fisher
The full moon on May 29th, what some are calling the full flower moon for spring, is going to be intense. New relationships will be blossoming while others will come to crashing ends. Old fears will be released as we suddenly realize what we feared was created by us all along. And with every wave of cosmic energy this year comes another step in awakening.
The turmoil of everyone suddenly challenging age-old beliefs and ideas is causing a cosmic storm of energy all by itself. Stay fixed on love, patience, and tolerance. Ultimately, we all want the same things, but we don't see it right now because there's a huge shift happening.
It's time for another episode of My Crypto World.
In this episode, I continue the series on bigfoot theories. There are many theories as to what bigfoot might be and where it came from
In this episode, I cover what is known as the missing link or evolutionary theory. This one is rather a short episode but worth a watch. I also give a short update at the end of the program on my current projects.
Our Alien Origins, Intelligent Design, And The Smoking Gun Examining The Mysterious Human Chromosome 2
By Dorraine Fisher
According to a few courageous scientists, as soon as DNA evidence entered the arena of the human story, the theory of evolution, at least in humans, should have died a natural death. Because DNA evidence has shaken the foundation of a hundred years of belief, and albeit worship, of Darwin’s famous theory that humans evolved from apes. But Darwin is said to have always claimed that his theory could eventually be disproven. And not even he could have ever predicted what would happen in the future, and the information we would be able to derive from genetic material.
The famous founder of The Star Child Project and human origins researcher, the late Lloyd Pye, called this new evidence the “smoking gun” in the case against human evolution from great apes.
A Controversial Question Of Humankind
By Dorraine Fisher
There are strange things going on in the human story. Anyone who’s following new anthropological data that’s being reported around the world has to admit that the story is getting stranger and stranger the more scientists keep digging. And there are some that believe this is shooting a lot of holes in Darwin’s theory of evolution. The math and the fossil records just don’t seem to support the theory.
To preface this, evolution is not fact. That’s why they call it a theory. Just because an idea is widely supported and largely believed to be substantiated by science still doesn’t make it a fact.
So You Still Don't Know If Bigfoot Is Real?
Lloyd Pye Weighs In
By Dorraine Fisher
So you still don't know if you believe in Bigfoot or not? That's fine. We respect that. But just make
sure you have all the information you need to make a decision. Make sure you know the whole
story and have looked at all the evidence. And make sure you've watched lectures by Lloyd Pye
explaining why we need to rethink.
Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a lecturer, author, and groundbreaker in the field of bigfoot. Author of Everything You Know is Wrong, founder of The Star Child Project, and purveyor of Intervention
Theory, which offers a different explanation of human origins, Lloyd dared to challenge the scientific
community by thinking outside the box and introducing some new ideas to the public, including
the origins of bigfoot and their links to our own origins. Sadly he passed away in 2013, but we still
have his legacy in these lectures on Youtube. Watch while Lloyd lays out all the facts and explains
why Bigfoot is certainly real.
***********DF
This Post By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher. Dorraine is a Professional
Writer, photographer, a nature, wildlife and Bigfoot enthusiast who has
written for many magazines. Dorraine conducts research, special
interviews and more for The Crypto Crew. Get Dorraine's book The Book Of Blackthorne!
This post sponsored in part by
(Interested in sponsoring a story? then send us an Email!)
Evolution Vs. Creationism - What If They’re Both Right?
The Ancient Sumerians, Intervention Theory, and the Forbidden History of Our Origins
By Dorraine Fisher
Science and religion are often intertwined...whether they want to be or not.
And no matter what people believe about where we humans came from, there may always be disagreement. And the debate between religion and science is the biggest debate about our origins raging to this day.
Evolution vs. creationism is an argument with which most of us are familiar. And it can be a very angry topic for both sides. One side believes we evolved, as Charles Darwin theorized, gradually from great apes. The other side, the religious side, claims that humans and our planet are simply too profoundly amazing and unique that we must have been intelligently designed by a creator.
But what if they’re both right, in a sense? What if there were elements of both evolution AND creation that shaped who we’ve become?
And what am I talking about?
There is real-world evidence to support such an idea out in the fringes of historic record. And it’s called Intervention Theory. But first we have to look at what’s wrong with both sides of the argument.
Creationism is considered by many to be a wonderful story, a myth, if you will, though it neglects to explain important details scientifically. But since science wasn’t a prevalent endeavor at the time the Old Testament was written, this is to be expected. And I think the people of the time made an interpretation of events they saw take place in the only way they could understand. And they accepted stories that were handed down to them because this is how they learned about their history.
Evolution, on the other hand, relies on evidence that’s been found that shapes the idea that humans evolved gradually from great apes into what we are now. And there is a lot of evidence to support this theory, but it’s hard to find enough evidence to support the idea that evolution affected us in the same way as other animals. There isn’t enough evidence to support the idea that we evolved directly from great apes. The major hurdle that science can’t seem to resolve is that about 200,000 years ago, great apes made an enormous and somewhat unusual evolutionary leap, and humans, albeit homo sapiens, emerged seemingly out of nowhere, and became a dominant force on the planet in a relatively short time. After millions of years of lumbering along at an evolutionary snail’s pace, we suddenly burst onto the scene at an accelerated rate of speed.
Why?
Science has never answered this question satisfactorily. But what if the ancient myths have been telling the story all along and we’ve been ignoring it because of what we’ve been taught to believe? Now, we always shut down when we science-minded types hear the word myth, because it all seems so UN-scientific, but try to just stay with me on this.
When I was in grade school, and we learned about the first civilizations, we were always taught that the ancient texts they inscribed everywhere were just myths; like stories told to children that explained all the things to which they really didn’t know all the answers. But what if they aren’t myths at all? Inscriptions on stones were not the easiest thing to accomplish. There was a lot of labor involved in making them. Why would they tell mythical stories to them with no historical significance? Wouldn’t it make more sense to inscribe actual events? We assume that, since the texts often refer to “gods” that it must be their mythology. But what if they were telling about real people they believed to be gods? How would that change our interpretation?
This is the question that a man named Zecharia Sitchin wanted to answer. Sitchin, a Russian-born scholar, author, linguist, and researcher specializing in cuneiform writing, had been driven for years to meticulously study the Sumerian inscriptions and finally crack the code of those ancient texts like no one had been able to do before. He was one of only a couple hundred people in the world capable of interpreting cuneiform writing. And he eventually claimed he succeeded in interpreting the Sumerian texts in 1976, in his book, The Twelfth Planet, where he told a story from them that revealed a possibility so shocking that it rocked the scientific world and led it to dig in its heels and deny it all. But it also led many to question long-held scientific interpretations of the texts. This gave rise to what is now called Intervention Theory ....or the alternative story of how the world and we humans were “created”... by the so-called “gods.”
In these texts, Sitchin explains from his interpretation of The Seven Tablets of Creation also called the Enuma Elish, the Sumerian’s story of the Annunaki, or the gods they served. These were living, breathing, flesh-and-blood beings that were described as having the appearance of humans and the emotions and flaws of humans also. They told of the gods often being angry, selfish, or jealous. But they could also be benevolent, caring, and charitable. They were very tall, possibly 8 to 10 feet, as depicted in the texts, and believed to be immortal, but probably just had very long life spans. They were highly advanced beings that flew, not on their own, but with the aid of flying machines that the people may not have understood well enough to describe as anything except giant metal birds. And they had many other forms of technology.
The solar system according to Sumerian texts.
And they have depicted our solar system with twelve planets, counting earth’s moon, revolving around the sun. As the story goes, the earth, or the planet the gods called Tiamat was hit by one of the moons of a roving planet that had spun out of its orbit. The force was so intense that earth was broken in half and spun, on fire, out of control for a very long time before it finally reshaped itself and slowly became the living planet we know today, with water, living plants, and evolving wildlife, including some largely unimpressive primates believed to be some of our pre-human ancestors. Though they had a very long way to go to become what we are today.
In the meantime, according to the story, in our solar system, there was a twelfth planet the Annunaki called Nibiru, that would spin in and out of our orbit every 3600 years, and this is the planet they claimed they came from. And they were said to have come here to Tiamat or Earth looking for gold to fix the damage they had done to their own atmosphere on Nibiru.
The strange orbit of Nibiru was considered impossible in years past, but many astronomers now agree it's possible.
And it was at about this time 200,000 years ago history tells us that the ancient Sumerian culture seemed to appear out of nowhere in what is now Iraq, highly advanced, when the rest of the humanoid beings on earth were scattered and living in caves.
And as the story continues, their quest for gold continues. But extracting it is hard, tedious work, and the Annunaki don’t like doing it. So they devised a plan to take the little humanoid beings that already existed here, now believed by many to be homoerectus, and use their technology and their own DNA to genetically manipulate and hybridize themselves a worker race to mine the gold in southern Africa. This race needed to be just intelligent enough to follow instructions and do the work, but not so intelligent as to cause trouble.
And so it came to pass, these “gods” created the human race, probably in their own image, and they called them Adamu, a name curiously close to the name Adam from the Old Testament. And incidentally, the ancient Hebrews, having been exposed to this story through their enslavement, later appear to have created their own version of it which is now the Old Testament (I’ll be talking about that more in the future.)
The "goddess" Enki presenting the first human of their creation, curiously called Adamu. Does the equipment to the left appear to resemble a laboratory of some sort?
The Annunaki probably made many mistakes at first, but they finally came up with a “product” that could reproduce on its own. Us. A being far from perfect, with many genetic flaws, not quite suited to life on earth, but intelligent enough to utilize its own world and survive independently and procreate while doing the work of the gods.
But where’s the proof?
There is some very compelling evidence to support this.
First of all, humans have DNA that can’t be recognized as belonging in this world. It has often been called junk DNA, but is more often now curiously called “alien” DNA. Are they more right than they realize?
Second of all, if we, as humans on earth, had continued on the same trajectory and at the same speed as we had done on our early evolutionary path, it would have taken roughly 5 million more years for us to have reached the point of being able to build a real civilization than it did. And to reach the machine age and the space age might have taken another 5 million years. But something launched us forward at an accelerated pace. Think of early humans lumbering along trying to make better arrowheads, and then suddenly being launched into civilization. And only 66 years time elapsed between the Wright brothers first flight and the first man on the moon. How did we suddenly get so smart and so advanced? This all happened far too quickly for evolution to have taken place in the true sense of the word.
Thirdly, if you do your research, you’ll find that we humans don’t really resemble great apes in very many ways. Great apes are designed for their environment, have greater bone density, a covering of fur, better vision and hearing and olfactory senses required to live on this planet. If we humans evolved for life on this planet, why are we so poorly designed for the task? Darwin was correct and evolution is a real thing. It’s been proven time and time again in other species. But the very purpose of evolution is to create a better biological design in a species so it can better survive in its environment. Why do we need to wear clothes and shoes and sunglasses for protection on the planet on which we are supposed to have evolved? Why do we have hundreds of genetic defects? Defects that only usually happen in genetically modified species like pets and livestock that have been manipulated and hybridized? It doesn’t make sense unless intervention theory is true.
Though humans are supposed to have evolved from great apes, the real resemblances are few. As a species, we humans seem much more fragile at first glance.Though we have much larger brains and hands designed for tasks that are much more detailed like playing music or creating art.
And lastly, the most important and significant of all the evidence. The fused chromosomes. Great apes have 48 sets of chromosomes. We have 46, and were supposed to have evolved from these great apes. It isn’t possible under natural circumstances to lose two chromosomes and come out better. But maybe we didn’t really lose anything. We have fewer sets because the second and third of the old primate (possibly homoerectus) chromosomes were fused together. All humans have this, and it’s not something that happens naturally in any living species. That is something that only happens in a lab. Scientists have been working hard to come up with an explanation for this, but what if it’s simply because we’re a genetically manipulated species? This is what intervention theorists consider to be the smoking gun.
Human chromosomes. Notice the 2nd pair of chromosomes at the top. Great apes have 48 pairs. We have 46. How did we lose two chromosomes and become better? Perhaps the answer is, we didn't lose anything. The 2nd and 3rd ape chromosomes have been fused together to create us. This is a process that doesn't occur naturally. Only in a lab. The proverbial smoking gun.
So, could this be how the human race came to be...in such a short period of time? Are we half extra-terrestrial and half caveman? Are evolutionism and creationism both true in our origins?
Evolution is real. But could this mean creationism is real too? Just a little different than we thought?
The Old Testament said “Let us create man in OUR image.” Is that what they did, but in an unexpected way? Did they use their own DNA to create us? What if we actually were an evolved species like Darwin contended, but helped along a little in our advancement by “intelligent design” by the so-called gods who were actually just flesh-and-blood beings from another world so advanced as to be called gods? How would that affect the way we look at our history...and our spirituality? My guess is it wouldn’t really change anyone’s core beliefs all that much. But it might end the argument once and for all.
If you’d like to know more about the Annunaki and Intervention Theory, read the book by Zecharia Sitchin, The Twelfth Planet, or watch this video:
In the meantime, Intervention Theory and Zecharia Sitchin are still, after more than 30 years, subject to debate.
***********DF
This Post By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher. Dorraine is a Professional
Writer, photographer, a nature, wildlife and Bigfoot enthusiast who has
written for many magazines. Dorraine conducts research, special
interviews and more for The Crypto Crew. Get Dorraine's book The Book Of Blackthorne!
This post sponsored in part by
(Interested in sponsoring a story? then send us an Email!)
Around the Campfire - 6 Reasons to Wonder if Humans Aren't of this World ( Ep10)
It's finally here! episode 10 of Around the Campfire with Dorraine Fisher! In this episode Dorraine asks some good questions and makes some good points concerning humans and where we really come from. I'm sure some of the 6 reasons Dorraine talks about, are ones you have never even thought of before. You might want to get a pencil and take some notes, this is a good one.
After yesterday's post about this unknown cave creature sighting, some forward progress has been made with the old 1696 document and with the discovery of a possible second entrance into the cave system.
To keep this post short, I felt it was best to just make a short video about these new findings. The opinion I offer in the video about what the creature might be is merely a guess at this point but it could be a possibility.
Here is the video
This will turn out to be a rather large post, as there is a lot of information and mystery involved in this case. There are also ongoing research and investigation efforts regarding this case.
First, let me start with the sighting report that was sent to me.
By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher Professional Writer, a nature and wildlife enthusiast who has written for many magazines.
Have Humans Shaped The Evolution Of Sasquatch?
By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher
We humans impact our world every day in ways we don’t even realize. And one way is our influence over other creatures around us. We all live on earth together and we all need to find ways to eat, avoid danger, and reproduce. That’s the only way any species can survive. But we impact other species as well.
Think about all the wildlife that lives close to us in our backyards. In our advancements in civilization and mastery of our surroundings, we’ve actually changed the behavior and evolution of the squirrels and rabbits that live there?
In order for certain animals to exist close to us, they have to watch us closely and learn our habits in order to survive literally under our feet. It would be to their evolutionary benefit to observe problems we create for them and adjust their life patterns and adapt themselves in order to occupy the same spaces we do.
For instance they might learn the nature of vehicle traffic in order to cross the street without getting killed. And those that survived became the parents of the next, more evolved generation of traffic evaders. Those little animals on the bottom of the food chain that we believe to be much less intelligent than ourselves, have actually adapted a brand of their own super-intelligence in order to continue existing in great numbers in heavily human-occupied areas.
Our very own pet dogs are the most extreme example of this. Scientists theorize that dogs came to exist when certain groups of wolves began to follow humans and scavenge their camps. Particular wolves found they could make an easier living off food scraps left by humans, and they soon made a habit of following them.As time passed and they advanced closer to human camps and villages, some of the wolves realized if they endeared themselves to humans and acted friendly, they could get closer to food or even have food given to them. They gave birth to their offspring closer to humans and we found other benefits to having them around, and man’s best friend entered the human scene forever. Our species profoundly influenced the evolution of theirs. To this day our dogs watch us constantly and are always learning how to live with us better. It’s a true miracle of biology.
And it’s no different with sasquatches, though the reasons may be different. The Sasquatch is a very successful species that has evolved such amazing skills that some humans believe them to be almost magical. They move amazingly fast for their size, hide amazingly well, and are experts at hunting and finding many different food sources.In the interest of surviving alongside humans for thousands of years, it has been in their evolutionary interests to adapt those amazing skills.
Sasquatches are super-sized omnivores.And for very large animals to exist on earth requires a supreme ability to find enough food, avoid danger, and maintain a viable breeding population.And since sasquatches are dominant predators at the top of the food chain, humans are the only other species that present any real threat to them.
So it would certainly be in their best interests to study humans and observe the problems we create for them and adapt themselves around them.Sasquatches have evolved these incredible skills, at least in part, to live in a world where another highly intelligent species dwells also. According to legend, they’ve encountered humans regularly since the beginning of the human story. And due to their shy nature and their will to survive, they’ve evolved an amazing camouflaged appearance and superior skills for hiding and escaping. They need those skills to hunt, of course, but they also need them to avoid their only natural enemy: us.
Animals evolve themselves in relation to other animals all the time, and it’s very possible that sasquatches are no different.
They manage to stay hidden from us very well and yet still manage to be highly successful in their own world. But we don’t necessarily have the monopoly on intelligence or dominance no matter how much we’d like to think so. And interestingly enough, as we study them in the wild and learn their habits and begin to understand their rare talents and abilities and unlock all the mysteries about them, maybe they’ll begin to change our evolution also.
[*TCC - Dorraine Fisher is a freelance writer and nature and wildlife enthusiast who has written for many magazines.]
[* Copyright The Crypto Crew ]
The recent discovery of a giant squid with huge basketball size eyes has been promoted as an evolutionary survival response for detecting enemy sperm whales that would eat it.
But, how did the squid avoid the whales while its big eyes were still evolving over, supposedly, millions of years? Partially evolved eyes over millions of years do no good. Natural selection wouldn't have preserved them. The truth is the squid's eyes were designed from the beginning!
Natural selection occurs in nature but it doesn't produce biological traits. It only "selects" them. Natural selection can only "select" from biological traits and variations that are possible and which have survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. It's simply another term for survival of the fittest. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before.
Genes, not natural selection, produce biological traits. The real issue is not natural selection but what traits are genetically possible.
There are limits to evolution and natural selection in nature. Only evolution within biological "kinds" is possible (such as varieties of dogs, cats, horses, cows, etc.). Evolution is not possible across biological "kinds." The genes already exist in all species for micro-evolution (evolution within "kinds") but not for macro-evolution (evolution across "kinds").
Genetic information cannot happen by chance. Therefore, genetic and biological similarities between species are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in all the various forms of life.
What about "Junk DNA"? The latest science shows that "Junk DNA" isn't junk after all! It's we who were ignorant of how useful these segments of DNA really are. Recent scientific research published in scientific journals such as Nature has revealed that these "non-coding" segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Just because these segments don't code for proteins or traits doesn't mean they're not useful or that they don't code for something else.
How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems, etc. were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
What is bigfoot? That is a question that has been ask for a long time now and many theories have been put forth. I want to explore some of the more popular theories and offer some of the more unusual ones as well. Please continue and I hope you enjoy the reading.
Theories - Primate Theory -
The primate theory is the belief that bigfoot/sasquatch is just a yet undiscovered or unknown primate that belongs to the ape family. Bigfoot has been described in reports as a large hairy ape-like creature. Many point to fossil records and claim that bigfoot is related to Gigantopithecus blacki which was a species of the largest apes that ever lived, standing up to almost 10 foot tall. Many researchers and bigfooters are behind this theory and think bigfoot is some type of ape creature.
Evolutionary Theory -
This can also be called the "missing link" theory. Some think that bigfoot is the missing link in the evolutionary chain. That bigfoot is in a transitional form, a step just below or in between human and ape. I have seen,heard and read this info from many researchers and it is one of the more popular theories.
Neanderthal Theory -
This theory promotes the idea that bigfoot is a small race of Neanderthal man that has managed to survive all these years. That they have the intelligences to live and hide as they are smarter than other creatures living in the forest. This makes me wonder if it really is a group of Neanderthals then why have they not discovered fire yet? One could assume that if they are already using fire it would be almost impossible for them to stay hid. To me this theory has some holes in it.
Lost Tribe Theory -
The lost tribe theory is a theory that a small tribe of Indians kept hide for years from everyone,totally undiscovered. As time continued they were forced to resort to inbreeding,which led to a mutation that produced a hairy beast that is now known as bigfoot. That this lost tribe is still around today,inbreeding and making more sasquatch. To me this theory has some holes., for one if bigfoot was a lost Indian tribe then they should still have the tools that Indians have used in many years past.They should still be using bows,arrows,tomahawks and more,but yet there is no reports of any of these tools found in or around past sighting. So to me this theory is not answer to the question at hand.
Other Theories that seem kind of far fetched to most people.
Cain Theory -
That bigfoot is the Cain talked about in the bible. This theory comes from the Mormon church. According to the theory, "the mark" God placed on Cain is his fearsome appearance, which serves the dual purpose of making people afraid of him, and thereby rendering him safe from being killed.
Inter dimensional Theory -
This theory,which is supported by many, states the bigfoot is able to travel in and out of other dimensions at will. They point to the fact that bigfoot seems to disappear and is hard to find and record.
Alien Theory -
This theory leans towards bigfoot being either an alien itself or being placed here by aliens to live and possible report on human behavior. There has been reports of UFOs and bigfoot sighting in the same areas and at roughly the same times.
So I hope you have found this information interesting. I'm sure if you search around you can find many more theories concerning bigfoot.
Now if I could put forth my personal thoughts on what bigfoot really is or could be. I'm no expert by any means and I don't claim to be.
I'm in the group of the Creationist, who think that all things were created by a creator (God), but with that said I also believe in evolution of species, Meaning that things evolve but they do not evolve into another species. For example lets take a rat, over time it may evolve in some ways to adapt to its environment or living conditions. It may grow a shorter or longer tail,bigger or smaller ears,change color or something like that but it will never evolve into a Pony.
So I tend to lean towards bigfoot being a undocumented primate of some sort.
Recently some DNA claims have been made that bigfoot has 100 percent human DNA. This is not surprising to me. For many years now it has been known that Humans and chimpanzees are Nearly 99 percent alike in genetic makeup, so if bigfoot DNA has been tested and it comes back close to human DNA it should not be a big surprise. My best guess would be that considering what we already know about Chimp and Human DNA, that bigfoot DNA is very close to Human DNA, say maybe 99.9 percent. This does not prove a "missing link" theory as we already know about established DNA results of Humans and Chimps. If the results in Humans and Chimps are true, I assume they are, then it only shows what a difference 1 percent can make.
Regardless of which theory you support we should all be able to agree that bigfoot is worthy of more research and study.
Posts
