First let me say - I'm not saying this is a Bigfoot, but would like to see what others think it might be. I was out testing out the night vision on a new camera and filmed some eyeshine. The local camp dogs were going crazy. At first, I didn't see the eye shine because I was trying to see how to turn on the night vision and couldn't see the buttons.
Large Creature Crosses Small Road Art By Thomas Marcum
The Following is a bigfoot sightings report. This is the personal sighting as told by Bobby Long.
Here is his story:
WHO: Bobby Long & Corinna Poland WHERE: Douglas County, Oregon WHEN: October 3, 2004 TIME OF DAY: Dusk,It was near dusk but still nice and light on the road and dark in the trees. CITY: Roseburg, OR. SEEN FOR: 5-7 seconds NUMBER OF WITNESSES: 4 witnesses
A bigfoot came from the treeline right in front of our brown and orange Ford f150 pick-up. It stepped out from the bank to the center of the one lane fire trail, one step more and it was in a brushy clearing. The road was a fire trail/logging road about 10' wide in red clay.
It went through the clearing and into the next tree-line, we lost sight but could hear tree breaks and grunting as if a warning to us or other creatures.
It did bump it's head on a tree when it stepped up the apposing bank, I could barely touch the branch with my finger-tips while on my toes.
There were 3 rifles in the truck, nobody shot. One of my witnesses,John, chose to pursue it for a few seconds until he realized it wasn't anything he'd seen before.We made him get back in the truck.
The creature was cold black, about 8 feet I'd guess and the stride and tracks were impossible for a person to do. It's hair looked matted on it's upper back.
We returned to the area several times hoping for tracks or another sighting but motorcycles and ATV have since taken over the area.
-End Of Report
TCC - Thanks goes to Bobby and Corinna for sharing the encounter with us and everyone. I had some custom art in the works for his report but it kind of fell through due to some unforeseen problems. So I decided to make the art myself, It's not very good but at least you can get a sense of what the area and the creature looked like.
Thanks
Tom
A remote jungle in the Congo has yielded a new species of monkey, the first to be found in almost 30 years. Scientists discovered the lesula in the Democratic Republic of Congo's Lomami forest basin after spotting an unusual monkey being kept as a pet in a small forest town, reports CNN. Further investigation revealed that it was an entirely new species, which dwells only in the still largely unexplored Lomami forest.
"We never expected to find a new species there," the lead researcher says, "but the Lomami basin is a very large block that has had very little exploration by biologists." But while the lesula is new to science, it is no stranger to local hunters. Scientists fear hunting and other human pressures could soon wipe out the monkey and many other species in the region. "The challenge for conservation now in Congo is to intervene before losses become definitive," the lead researcher says, adding that the Lomami region is soon to become a protected national park.
TCC - This is yet another newly discovered Monkey, If you remember the snub nose monkey was discovered several months ago as well.....so just how long until the OFFICIAL discovery of Bigfoot?
This little guy kind of looks like an old man to me.
This is a video I have had on my computer for several years. I do not remember where I got it or the story behind the video. A figure is seen walking left to right in front of a couple people. I have done various effects on the clip but still wonder if it is really a ghost or a person. In any case, it is a neat video...of something or someone.
I went out to pick up a game cam and thought it would be a good time to test out my new camera.Not a lot on the video but it does show we go out in the woods and are not just "keyboard warriors" all the time.
I hope to get back out in the mountains very soon.
Thanks
Tom
The Crypto Crew's Jason Morse does some research work out in the field. Several interesting fines,possible tree knocks and more during the video.
Could this be evidence of sasquatch?
To find evidence you have to get out in the woods.
There are many things to look and listen for while out doing research.
Thanks
Maybe
you remember this video? It was featured on Finding Bigfoot season one and touted as a real white bigfoot by members
of the show’s crew.So, of course, the
team at The Crypto Crew had to take a look.
But
to us, it became clear that this so-called “white bigfoot” looked very strange.
For one thing, it’s white coat turned tan at the elbows down to the hands. And
he also looked dark-colored from the waist down.And this supposed “white bigfoot” looked very
small and lanky...and highly suspicious.
So
our very own video expert, Tom Marcum, did an analysis. And here’s what he
found.
In July 2 young girls,age 8 and 11, were attacked by a beaver and suffered serious injuries. In August a beaver attacked a boy scout leader in Pines Plains, N.Y. biting him in the leg, buttocks, arm, hand and torso before he managed to grab it and hold its jaw closed.
Now Lillian Peterson, 83 years old, was attacked by a rabid beaver while out for her half mile swim.
The attacked took place at Barcroft Lake near her home in Falls Church, Va.
"The animal jumped on me," she told WUSA-TV. "He hit me so hard it knocked me over and started chewing on my leg."
The beaver weighed 35 pounds and was nearly two feet long!
Peterson's friend, Mike Korin, managed to pound the beaver with his paddle until it appeared dead. Emergency medical crew arrived on the scene and began treating Peterson.
Then, all of a sudden, the beaver flipped over and came back to life! A paramedic grabbed a canoe paddle to beat the beaver yet again while
Korin tossed a fishing net over the creature and tethered it to a light
pole on the lake shore. Animal control officers arrived on the scene and euthanized the beaver. The beaver was later confirmed to have been rabid.
Peterson will undergo a few rounds of rabies shots. Peterson said “There is no way I will swim in that place again,”
TCC - This story makes be wonder if it is possible for sasquatch to become rabid?
This was recorded in Upstate New York. The Researcher is Billy Mills. This video is brought to you by Renegade Bigfoot Society, N.E.B.O & The Crypto Crew. Turn up your speakers a little.
Amazing reply knocks and not just a couple but many.
As
we’re still waiting for Dr. Ketchum’s DNA results, some other DNA results are
making headlines these days that could pose some new questions about DNA results
we explore for unknown species’ in the future.
The
Star Child skull has been found to share no DNA structure with any other
species on earth. But does this mean it’s alien, or simply that it has no
relation to normal human genetics? Humans share at least a percentage of their
DNA structure with every animal on earth. But the Star Child shares none. So
what gives?
The
Star Child Project has been in place since February of 1999 with the objective
of discovering the origin of a human-like skull found in a mine tunnel in
Copper Canyon in northwest Mexico.It
was found alongside a normal human female skull but, upon examination, bears
only a slight resemblance to a human, which has led many to speculate about what
it is.
At
first glance it appears to be the skull of a deformed human child. But
deformity has been ruled out with careful analysis. And, in spite of its
child-size, it is no longer believed to be a child at all. Examination of the
tooth wear of the skull indicates this being was at least the age of a young
adult.
Human
eye sockets are generally about two inches deep, while the eye sockets on the
Star Child skull are only one half inch deep. This means its eyes would have
not have functioned anything like human eyes and probably looked very different
from human eyes.
The
cranial/brain volume of the Star Child was much larger suggesting a much larger
brain than humans. And the hole where the brain enters the skull is oval shaped
rather than round like a human neck. This suggests that it had no voice
mechanism and would not have been able to speak like a normal human. Does this
mean it communicated via telepathy?
Possibly
these results raise more questions than they answer, but it leaves us to wonder
about other DNA results we’re waiting for. There’s been so much speculation
about what the bigfoot DNA results will reveal. Will we find that bigfoot is
related more to humans, is it possibly alien, (which would have seemed a crazy
question to ask just a year ago) or are they something else entirely?
Knowing
the unprecedented results of the Star Child DNA study, the possibilities for
bigfoot are now endless. *******
This
picture was taken by a subject known only as Zartha. This person was strolling
in a local park (location unknown) when he/she saw this at the end of the long,
dark sidewalk. Could it be a real werewolf captured on film? Bigfoot?
Mothman?Or something else? The person
reported there were no lights and the end of this walkway. So what is this? I
don’t know, but it’s fun to think about. You make the call.
* My apologizes to MK Davis, I did not know it was him who did work on this,Part of the video we used was some of his work,I spent hours looking at many videos from various youtube accounts, Never seen MK Davis on the account or Credit would have been given at the first. I did spend countless hours going frame by frame,zooming and trying to pull out details. I compared it to many different youtube Patterson videos. I did advance it by adding in the head turn and more. Once again my apologies to MK Davis.
Patty squatted down
So
You Still Don’t Think The Patterson-Gimlin Film Is A Real Sasquatch?
The
Crypto Crew Offers Some Reasons To Reconsider
By TCC Team Member
Dorraine Fisher
It’s
a neverending debate. Is it fact or faked?
But
after the countless scientific studies that have been conducted on the famous
Patterson-Gimlin bigfoot film shot in Bluff Creek, California back in 1967, it
still hasn’t been disproven. But I’m always surprised to find how many people
still believe it’s a hoax. Didn’t several people confess to wearing the suit that
day? Yes, and that makes it easy for some to settle for the idea of it being a
hoax when they don’t know all the facts about the film. The story runs quite a
bit deeper than many imagine.
There
are numerous discrepancies. As the film has been studied over and over again,
many details can be found that point to it being the real deal...if one bothers
to look.
Patty's Toes are seen moving,original frames - photo from Themunnsreport.com
Up
and down movement of the creature’s toes is one. This kind of movement in a
costume isn’t possible. The creature’s calf muscles flex as she walks; also not
possible in a suit. Many have tried to duplicate this muscle movement in a suit
and not accomplished it as yet. And the open and closing motion of the mouth is
not possible if it’s someone wearing a mask. But the biggest problem with the
idea of it being a suit is that human proportions and ape proportions are not
the same. Apes have must longer arms and a much longer upper lip making it
impossible for a human to fit properly into a suit such as the one in the film.
Human arms would be too short and not able to function like a creature, and the
mask would not fit a human properly...and a hoaxer certainly would not be able
to move its mouth in a mask as it struggled with this inconvenience.
Bob
Hieronimous was one of the guys who confessed to wearing the suit that day. But the
subject in the film was found to be at least 6.5 feet tall. Other studies have
showcased the possibility she was closer to 7.5 feet tall. But either way, Bob
H. wasn’t tall enough to wear a suit that big.
Patty's Butt Crack
Another
thing that’s rarely discussed is a portion of the film at the very beginning
when the camera was shaking. Patty was squatted down on the ground, looking for
food, defecating, or drinking or eating. But with a little enhancement to the
film, her butt crack can be seen pretty clearly. This is a strong detail that
wasn’t being created in costumes back in the 1960s. It would have taken a lot
of time and meticulous work to create such a compelling detail.
And
lastly but certainly not least, on examining the ending of the film closer, a
second creature, possibly a male, can be seen moving near the creek bed. It
appears to be moving its arms and then moving its head to look back at Patty.
Is this another guy in a suit?Probably
not. It would be hard enough to create one suit, let alone two. The main focus
has always been on the subject, Patty, so there are many other details of the
film that have been overlooked. *******
Most
primates live in small groups. Should sasquatches be any different?
The famous Patterson-Gimlin film
taken at Bluff Creek, California way back in 1967 was always said to be a film
of a single sasquatch female walking across a dry creek bed and into the cover
of the woods only to disappear. But if primates live in groups, especially
females, was she really alone that day?
The
film has been subject to scrutiny for years, but no one has ever been able to
completely debunk it. And no one has ever been able to create a costume that
compares with the creature in the film. And since often only one of the
creatures is spotted at a time, we’re conditioned to believe they are solitary
creatures that travel and hunt alone.But interestingly enough, no one has ever looked at anything else in the
film except the main subject affectionately known by bigfoot enthusiasts as
“Patty.”
But
if you watch the film more closely and look behind her on the hill, there seems
to be other things going on. There are some very dark figures moving ever so
slightly in the woods in the background. Could there be more of the creatures
hiding in the brush? Could there be a whole group of them there?
Random youtube video of the Patterson film, 2nd figure is seen standing
The
Crypto Crew’s very own team leader Tom Marcum, a video and photo expert,
decided to take a closer look at the background in the film. And one day he
spent hours going frame by frame and working with still shots until he reached
an astonishing conclusion.
When
he came across a frame that looked curious, he highlighted it to the maximum,
only to discover at least three other figures that can be identified as possible
primates in the dark woods.And then
there are many other dark figures that are not so recognizable that could
possibly be others.
Zoom from the above random youtube video of the Patterson film
But it became clear that Patty wasn’t alone at Bluff
Creek that day. She had her whole family
with her nearby.Roger Patterson swore to the film’s
authenticity till his dying day.
And Tom’s hard work gives it even more
credibility.******** DF
Posts
