Monday, January 16, 2012

Timeline for the Dr. Melba Ketchum DNA Report


Timeline for the Dr. Melba Ketchum DNA Report.

We now have a good timeline for the Ketchum DNA report.
Early January 2011: Submitted to a journal for consideration for peer review.

Mid-February 2011: Accepted by the same journal for peer review.

February – October 2011: 8 month long initial peer review process.

October 1, 2011: Ketchum gives the date of December 31, 2011 in reference to her paper.

October 2011 (around the time of the Honobia Conference): Paper returned for changes, as in a rewrite. It is not known how extensive the changes were that the peer reviewers wanted.

October 2011: Paper undergoes a rewrite.

December 31, 2011: Ketchum hopes to have passed peer review with the rewritten paper.
Just into the New Year, 2012: Ketchum giddily posts on her site. “Oh well, it won’t be long now.” In her Southern US dialect, this means sooner than soon. This may indicate that she passed her peer review.

Will the paper be published in a quarterly or a monthly journal?
After doing a lot of research, sources felt that while journals come out monthly, most publish peer reviewed material quarterly. Therefore, they felt that the paper was probably going to be published in a quarterly issue of a journal. December 31 would have been a quarterly date, as would September 30, which was right around the time that Ketchum made her statement about December 31.

[Via Robert Lindsay Blog ]

TCC - Also remember we just posted the story about the NDA agreement between Randy Brisson and Dr. ketchum. Someone close to the DNA project stated: “Be forewarned: The BF DNA is about to hit the fan.” So maybe we are getting Close to a release.

Related Post - NDA agreement post


60+ videos & 600+ pictures  on our facebook site check it out by clicking the link below.
facebook.com/TheCryptoCrew


Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an Email


 
Help Support The Crypto Crew

Now you can get our blog on your Kindle!



2 comments:

  1. The beginning of this is completely wrong. Two of the major samples weren't even signed in until JULY 2011?

    I know I signed in the 1st of the two and the later was waiting for me.

    Instead of just posting what you think because someone else posted it, why don't you find out the truth?

    Best Wishes,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this is from Jan 2012 -- you can't find the truth because no one will tell it. Instead of posting here...why not go directly to Lindsay and correct him?

      Delete

The Crypto Crew - Submit Sighting - TCC Team
Interactive Sightings Map
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...