 |
| To Kill or Not to Kill |
A
Terrible Truth?
The
Great Burden Of Proof Of Sasquatch
By TCC Team Member
Dorraine Fisher
There’s
a subject in the Bigfoot community that’s mostly taboo. Many would never think
about it at all. Others might think about it but could never do it, while some
would most certainly do it in a heartbeat, just to lay the subject to rest.
To
kill a sasquatch or not is the most controversial question we face in our whole
quest for proof. With so many researchers out searching endlessly for just the
right evidence, do we ever realize that any evidence that’s found is just a
pittance. With so many different kinds of evidence being faked these days, we
have to force ourselves to ask the question,
“What will it really take for the rest of the world to believe beyond a
shadow of a doubt that sasquatches are real?”
You
know they’re real, and I know they’re real. Many of us feel we don’t need proof
because we know what we know. But the rest of the non-believing world DOES need
proof if we can even hope to protect them. But how do we do it?
The
hoaxers are becoming more skilled, and we argue endlessly about what’s real
evidence and what’s faked. We can only come to one solid conclusion about that,
and that is that there is far less evidence for the existence of the creatures
than we’d like to believe. If we consider that maybe 95% of existing so-called
evidence is actually fake, then it puts everything into a very sad perspective.
Real bigfoot evidence is rare.
Close-up
picture and video evidence of a live creature would still not be enough for
everyone. And even those that claim to
co-habitate with the creatures can’t produce a spot-on, clear photograph of
them. And even if they did, someone
would still call it a fake, and nothing would be resolved no matter what was
presented.
So,
knowing all this, what do we do about it? If every piece of evidence is
subjective; if there is nothing that we already have that proves to everyone
indisputably that the creature exists, what are we left with?
The
very least we would need is a live capture, which, in knowing what we know,
would be next to impossible. Should we have researchers running around the
woods with massive tranquilizer guns? Chances are, even IF you were able to
tranquilize a sasquatch at all, it would be out of sight and gone before you
could capture it. `So we’re left with the horrible, unspeakable idea of
acquiring a body to prove a point. Not just a piece of flesh and some DNA, but
an entire body easily recognized by everyone that could be analyzed and
recorded by the scientific community.
It’s
not an easy thing to talk about. It’s a horrible thing. But I dare say it’s in
the back of many of our minds.
There
was, of course, a lot of anger over the idea of the “Sierra Kills” and how it
supposedly happened, but were we all secretly a little relieved to think that
having Bigfoot DNA from an actual body in our possession might actually be the
big ticket to indisputable proof? Did we all take a deep breath and dare to
hope those creatures didn’t die in vane and we’d, in the most horrible way
imaginable, been given a gift that we’d waited so long to receive. Maybe two dead bodies sacrificed to save an
entire species?
Now
I don’t want to see one dead, and most everyone else doesn’t either. We want to
believe we can still prove this without that kind of evidence. Since we’re
still waiting for DNA proof and we don’t know when or if that might happen, if
we had another body in our possession right now that would remove every last
shred of doubt, would we condemn that death for long if it got us what we need
to save the rest of them? ****** DF
©The Crypto Crew
facebook.com/TheCryptoCrew
Now you can get our blog on your Kindle!
Posts
Great write up :)
ReplyDeleteoh....think we would have more luck killing one? and if they are interdimensional, think you can recover it over there? i guess i am saying i don't think we can...why? because it hasn't been done yet.
ReplyDeleteIf a "Bigfoot" was Killed (As in the Sierra Kills) and Announced, Would the Government get Involved and Cover it up anyways? And why would they? I am NOT Advocating Killing the Creature (Unless it came at you in a violent manner), It would be in our (and their) Best interest if they were Studied. Seems there are Several types, Some that are Cannibalistic to the Fruit/Leaf eating variety. Even Capture would be a NO for me, Simply because they Travel in Small Groups of 3 to 5, and the Removal or Death of One could be the Death to All.
ReplyDelete