 |
| Is this proof of bigfoot in NH? (I have made a color adjustment to the photo) |
"This picture was taken with a motion detecting trail camera, in, McDaniels marsh. Springfield N.H. on 9/13/12 at 12:37PM. The person who took the photo. Said it was over 70 degrees that day This Picture was looked at by a forensic photo specialist who lives on George Hill, Springfield, N.H. and he said it was a person in a suit. The person who took the photo estimates the height of the creature to be at least 9 feet tall."
I have been a little reluctant to post this photo because Craig did not take the photo. I personally do not know for sure who owns it, I did attempted contact with one person about the photo. I will gladly remove it at the request and proof of ownership.
The main reason I posted this is because we have had a ton of reports and done a lot of research and investigation in the Newmarket, New Hampshire area. Our own Jason Morse had a couple encounters with a bigfoot he calls "goliath", which if my memory is correct is what Jason estimated to be between 8-9 foot tall.
I have also zoomed in on the figure and done a little photo enhancing . Here are the results.
I do not know if this is real or not, it could be a person in a suit, but we have had a lot of reports from and around this area. If it really is 9 foot tall, then it could not be a person in a suit. Plus it does look pretty massive.
Anyone with more information about this photo or if you have had a sighting please contact Us at
thecryptocrew@kih.net
(Link to Follow up Report )
Thanks
~Tom~
facebook.com/TheCryptoCrew
Now you can get our blog on your Kindle!
.jpg)
Posts
The back ground looks a lot like the file that was taken up in Canada. There the person was outside and caught his eye one on and ran to his cabin for the camera and the Bf disappeared and reappeared several yards apart. I believe it was posted some where here awhile back.
ReplyDeleteIt's a very poor baggy bear suit look at the front of the knee to where the back of the knee is and the width is at Least a foot that should tell you all you need Know it's a very poor hoax
ReplyDeleteI'd have to agree,very poor hoax.
ReplyDeleteI've heard of this captured photo. I believe I know the owner of pic and know his wife. I don't believe it's a hoax ..
ReplyDeleteSeriously? If the big guy really does exist, this looks nothing like many other photos that purport to show Bigfoot, nor does it match hundreds of verbal/written reports (e.g. this photo shows an overly fat ass and legs), which more closely resembles a short, stout human!
ReplyDeleteyou must remember that not all Bigfoot look the same.
DeleteIt's left "toes" appear twice which suggests a too long exposure for the speed of movement, which could explain why the legs appear bagged out around the rear of the knees. If this were the case, it might ne the real deal.
ReplyDeleteI thought the toes were claws, and hence, a bear, but it seems the upper "toes" are actually the blurred out leaves on the plant in between the camera & the subject. No idea if this is real or not, but just thought I'd throw that out there.
Delete