While checking out the
Bigfoot Forums I ran across a topic about the Erickson video of Matilda the sleeping bigfoot. Bill Munns posted a very interesting photo comparison (featured above) of possible frames from the Matilda footage and a Chewbacca suit.
Here is what Mr. Munn had to say:
" It seems to me that this “infamous” Matilda is causing a lot of confusion and frankly, I’m tired of confusion and really would like to see progress toward clarity and truths we can rely upon.
So after considerable thought on the matter, I thought it’s time to try and make an effort to help clear up the confusion. The images I’m showing you are a few sample video frames I was given to analyze, and my conclusion was that the images shows a simple commercial Chewbacca mask with the hair modified to a different color and texture. The frames are each side-by-side with a picture of Chewie in about the same pose, for comparison.
With this posting, I cordially suggest the following:
1. If anyone wishes to publicly acknowledge that this is their footage, I invite them to do so, and if they are correct, I’ll acknowledge it to be true.
2. If anyone feels the video frames show a real creature and not a Chewbacca mask, I welcome their analysis of why we should consider that to be so.
3. If anyone has seen the “Matilda” footage, I invite you to let us know if this is or is not the footage you call “Matilda”, because maybe what I’m looking at isn’t her, and I welcome being corrected if that is so.
4. If my display of this chart causes anyone to feel that they should file some type of civil action against me, please have your lawyer contact me at wmunns@gte.net so we can set an appointment for my receiving the service of papers, and we can discuss the matter on the public record, in a court.
For the record, I will confidently and clearly offer an appraisal of evidence as being something real, if I truly find the evidence leads to that conclusion, and my appraisal of the PGF as being real supports that position. But as much as we must support what we find to be real or valid, we must also reject or discount what we find to be false or fake. Our obligation is to find the truth, and I think it’s time we all knew the truth about this “Matilda” thing. I finally decided it’s time I did my share to get the truth out.
So hopefully, someone who has seen the “Matilda” footage will tell us the truth. Is this her (pictured below), and is she real?
Bill"
- End Statement
Bill Munns is very respected and a true professional, so his opinion holds a lot of weight. Mr. Munns has also done extensive work on the famous Patterson "Patty" footage and concludes it to be a real bigfoot.
To find out more about Bill Munns and his work check out his website
So what could this all mean for the DNA Paper and the Erickson Videos? Well time will tell I guess but IF this is still frames of Matilda, then this is not a good thing for either the DNA paper or the Erickson videos.
Thanks
~Tom~
[Soruce:bigfootforums]
This post sponsored in part by
(Interested in sponsoring a story? then send us an Email!)
Posts
